Governor Ron DeSantis visits CFTOD to boast about dissolving Disney's Reedy Creek Improvement District

Feb 22, 2024 in "Reedy Creek Improvement District"

Posted: Thursday February 22, 2024 11:00am ET by WDWMAGIC Staff

Speaking at the headquarters of his Central Florida Tourism Oversight District near Disney Springs, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis dedicated an entire press conference to bragging about eliminating the Reedy Creek Improvement District and appointing his own hand-picked board of supervisors.

DeSantis listed many of the same justifications that he made a year ago when he signed the bill to dissolve the Reedy Creek Improvement District, including tax savings for small businesses in the district, state inspection of monorails, and what he describes as "positive government reform."

DeSantis said he "defied the pundits and the conventional wisdom of the narratives that people tried to spin and ultimately it's a result that you now have a local government here with this district that is functioning in ways that are much more transparent, much more accountable, and ultimately much more beneficial to the people who live and work in Central Florida. And so that is a win for not just the people in this region, but it's a win for the entire state of Florida."

Also speaking at the press conference was CFTOD Chairman Martin Garcia who said Reedy Creek Improvement District was "arguably the most egregious example of corporate cronyism in the history of modern America."

He described Disney as following "deplorable practices and policies," which he listed as including Disney hand-picking Reedy Creek board members and giving them free park passes and merchandise discounts.

Earlier this month, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida dismissed the lawsuit Walt Disney Parks and Resorts filed against DeSantis and CFTOD. The lawsuit challenged legislative changes that stripped Disney of its control over the Reedy Creek Improvement District, now the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District (CFTOD), alleging that these changes were retaliatory and violated Disney's First Amendment rights. The court ruled that Disney lacked standing to sue the Governor and the Secretary of Florida's Department of Commerce and dismissed Disney's claims against the CFTOD board members on the merits, stating that a facially constitutional statute cannot be challenged based on alleged unconstitutional motives of lawmakers.

In a statement released following the court case's dismissal, a Disney spokesperson told WDWMAGIC, "This is an important case with serious implications for the rule of law, and it will not end here. If left unchallenged, this would set a dangerous precedent and give license to states to weaponize their official powers to punish the expression of political viewpoints they disagree with. We are determined to press forward with our case."

DeSantis addressed Disney's lawsuit appeal and said today, "what would your relief be, you would get courts going to order that that the old district be restored? I mean, give me a break. That is not going to happen."

Discuss on the Forums

Get Walt Disney World News Delivered to Your Inbox

View all comments →

castlecake2.01 day ago

Yes

Stripes1 day ago

Has Disney/CFTOD continued to replace the purple direction signage with the new blue color scheme since CFTOD took over?

mkt1 day ago

You're right. The new document will be different. It will be "different" in the way that Chris Gaines was "different" from Garth Brooks or how the drummer from Nirvana is "different" from the singer of the Foo Fighters.

Unbanshee1 day ago

Both are effectively picked by the Governor, just not technically. Look no further than the communications "strategy" with the replacement of Gilzean of the Governor's office getting out ahead of every single step of the process

lazyboy97o1 day ago

The settlement acknowledged the “need” to change the comprehensive plan, which undermines this idea. So too does the lack of an agreement, as the 2032 Comprehensive Plan wasn’t that different than the again in force 2020 Comprehensive Plan.

Brian1 day ago

That's understandable for sure. I just felt inclined to make the distinction due to the ongoing conversation, as the district administrator is selected by the board, while the board is selected by the governor.

mkt1 day ago

The new agreement will be functionally the same as the one Disney was sued over.

pdude811 day ago

You're right. This has been going on so long I just lumped all the antagonists together.

Brian1 day ago

Not to nitpick, but Gilzean was district administrator, not a board member.

pdude811 day ago

A bigger risk than keeping Garcia and Gilzean on the board as active disruptors? I don't agree with their decision to stall the federal lawsuit, but I understand why they saw the status quo as a risk to growth over the next few years.

lazyboy97o1 day ago

You don’t think dropping your bargaining power in the middle is the best strategy in a negotiation?

flynnibus1 day ago

Again… we know nothing except both sides have shown signs of positive attitude and certainty of successful outcomes. What does that mean? None if us know. All we can speculate is… they know a lot more than they have said publicly… and obvious things like "desantis is not perpetual…" were clearly obvious to them when they made these choices.

UNCgolf1 day ago

That seems wildly optimistic.

flynnibus1 day ago

“Right now…” Yes, we all know this. But again, we don’t know what back room deal they have setup. Who knows… it could even include new legislation promises… Or Disney is just rolling with the hand they are dealt… maybe they have accepted that the time to sunset their advantages of rcid is here… none of us can tell what their true intentions are right now.