Disney files permit to begin Splash Mountain's retheme to Tiana's Bayou Adventure at Walt Disney World

Oct 14, 2022 in "Tiana's Bayou Adventure"

Posted: Friday October 14, 2022 8:56pm ET by WDWMAGIC Staff

Disney has filed a permit with Orange County to begin work on the redevelopment of Splash Mountain into Tiana's Bayou Adventure at Walt Disney World's Magic Kingdom.

The permit is for "Project CY1899" with an expiration date of June 30 2024, and is assigned to long-time Disney partner Belfour Beatty Construction. (Thanks to danlb_20000 on the WDWMAGIC Forums for spotting the permit.)

Belfour Beatty Construction has previously worked on Pandora - The World of AVATAR at Disney's Animal Kingdom and Remy's Ratatouille Adventure at EPCOT.

Tiana's Bayou Adventure opens at Walt Disney World's Magic Kingdom in late 2024, but Disney has not yet announced a closure date for Splash Mountain. Current estimates suggest a January 2023 closure for Splash Mountain.

Discuss on the Forums

Get Walt Disney World News Delivered to Your Inbox

View all comments →

imagineer9716 hours ago

Ok, let's try this again: From a Tokyo thread: Can't they just leave it alone???

MisterPenguin17 hours ago

Letting us know was beneficent of you.

LittleBuford18 hours ago

More than that, her name is an actual word, though admittedly one I’ve never encountered in another context: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/maleficent https://www.etymonline.com/word/maleficent

Eric Graham18 hours ago

I honestly really enjoyed the Cruella remake a lot to be honest.

McMickeyWorld19 hours ago

If they go for the easy route, they could just swap the figures for Duffy and Friends animatronics and that's it. With the IP, they don't need a very complex plot to work and be fun. It would sell millions in merchandise, a total success.

UNCgolf19 hours ago

If they do re-theme it in Tokyo, I wonder what it will be. I don't think OLC will be on board with changing it to Tiana; they'd probably want something different.

BocabearMar 22, 2024

I had forgotten about that, and the first one was cute... but none of the other live action remakes seem to be that great...it feels like all the sequel movies Disney was churning out in the late 90s, early 200s... Cinderella 2? Those were serious garbage...and now these live action remakes seem the same to me...

mickEbluMar 22, 2024

So are we finding out Dr. Facilier is making an appearance in TBA tomorrow or will it be just another mind boggling marketing decision from Disney when it comes to this attraction? Having a whole segment devoted to Keith David/ Facilier at the same event where they are doing a deep dive on the attraction would make zero sense unless he's in it.

James AlucobondMar 22, 2024

Cinderella is better, I think, but it’s really the only one, mostly because it didn’t concern itself with following the original story. The others are either unasked for facsimiles or weird attempts to make evil characters sympathetic (though I chuckle at Maleficent glossing over the fact that her name is literally meant to invoke the opposite of “beneficent”).

brb1006Mar 22, 2024

I really enjoyed the 1996 live-action adaptation of 101 Dalmatians.

BocabearMar 22, 2024

I can't think of one live action remake that was better than the original...I won't count Cruella because that was really something different.... There were things to like about the Cinderella and the BATB... but in general they never quite did it for me...Both of those movies had a dress problem... Cinderella's garish blue dress was so immense it wore her, and Belle's Golden gown was completely wrong period...Looked more like 1940s and way too demure... Actually Cinderella's Godmother gown was much prettier than what she conjured for Cindy...Almost like they made the white one for Cinderella and then changed their mind and decided to match the blue dress that was sold as Halloween costumes... The other live action remakes I think have all been terrible...

Rich TMar 22, 2024

Yes. And the remake isn’t strong enough (IMO) to be particularly memorable in script or visual style to stand out in its own. As lightweight as the animated classic is, it is very entertaining and memorable. That’s the whole problem with the remakes. Instead of presenting something original, cohesive and memorable, they’re chained to the curse of having to hit mandatory nostalgia-check-boxes even if doing so maybe isn’t the wisest move. Disney wants to have its cake and eat it too. And so we get a Little Mermaid remake with hideous CGI sidekicks and a Jungle Book where CGI characters are forced to perform clumsy, forgettable versions of songs that were wonderful in the original animated film.

Rich BrownnMar 21, 2024

Of course the cartoons are recognized more. The remake featured animals that looked like.. well, animals. They aren't a funny sketch version of them.

Rich TMar 20, 2024

I think the Jungle Book remake was definitely one of the better ones, certainly helped by the original animated film being so comparatively (and intentionally) lightweight. That said, the remake in retrospect (IMO) now seems kind of bloated, style-less and forgettable. Certainly, the CGI characterizations of Baloo, Bagheera, Shere Kahn, Louie and Kaa have not left even a tiny blip on the pop culture landscape, while the 1960’s hand drawn versions are still recognized and embraced. I wouldn’t be surprised if it turns out Disney actually is aware that the remakes don’t have the staying power of the originals, and is perfectly content to just let them serve their purpose as short-lived cash-grabs. It sure would be nice if all that time, money and talent went toward the creation of something original and wonderful.