Tiana's Bayou Adventure Virtual Queue Stays Open for 8 Hours Amid Freezing Wind Chills

Jan 10, 2025 in "Tiana's Bayou Adventure"

Gallery / 3 Photos
Tiana's Bayou Adventure Virtual Queue

Posted: Friday January 10, 2025 8:17am ET by WDWMAGIC Staff

January 7 2025 saw the second-longest 1 pm virtual queue window for Walt Disney World's Tiana's Bayou Adventure, staying open for 8 hours.

After just over 200 days in operation, the only longer window was December 24, 2024, when it reached 8 hours and 59 minutes. Cold weather with near-freezing wind chills likely kept guests away from outdoor attractions, particularly those involving water, contributing to the extended availability.

Tiana's Bayou Adventure Virtual Queue

On typical weather days, the virtual queue fills much faster, especially for newer attractions like Tiana's Bayou Adventure, which has an average 1 pm availability window of around 60 minutes.

While the afternoon window has seen record-setting availability, the 7 am virtual queue drop has shown no signs of slowing down. Guests continue to secure their spots within seconds, with the queue often reaching capacity in under a minute, even during the cold snap.

Tiana's Bayou Adventure remains one of two Walt Disney World attractions still operating a virtual queue, the other being EPCOT's Guardians of the Galaxy Cosmic Rewind.

While Disney has suggested a standby queue may be introduced at some point, no timeline has been announced. Notably, the attraction has operated without a virtual queue during special event evenings, including Mickey's Not-So-Scary Halloween Party and Mickey's Very Merry Christmas Party, where guests have been able to ride using only a standby queue with wait times typically between 25 minutes and an hour.

Tiana's Bayou Adventure Virtual Queue

Discuss on the Forums

Get Walt Disney World News Delivered to Your Inbox

Disgruntled Walt5 hours ago

I like your new picture. "Quizzical Walt"

Disstevefan15 hours ago

It was a necessary downgrade ;)

mickEblu5 hours ago

They reskinned a jet to celebrate the reskin of an attraction where a Fox threatened to skin a rabbit.

Tha Realest6 hours ago

They reskinned a jet to celebrate the reskin of an attraction.

Disstevefan16 hours ago

Exactly. Exactly We agree completely. When I said this, it was absurd. I wont say that ;)

EagleScout6107 hours ago

Only took them a year to get it working. Progress, I guess

DarrenD7 hours ago

Rode 2x times yesterday and it was working well! The most amount of stuff I've seen working since opening :)

JMcMahonEsq7 hours ago

Again, I don't get what your point is. Disney is a for profit publicly traded company. Everything decision is done for the benefit of the company/Disney. The officers of any company have fiduciary duty to make all decision in the best interest of the company. The sole purpose of any decision of a company is to benefit the company. They aren't non-profits or charities where the intended goal/purpose is to benefit a certain subset of the population. Guest/fan feelings are never a goal or why companies make decisions. They are a fulcrum to support goals. Businesses offer guest what the they want in order to make money. They don't make money in order to give customers what they want.

Brer Panther9 hours ago

I know that just by posting this I'm stepping into a minefield, but I genuinely do not remember seeing any complaints, or hearing of any complaints, about Splash Mountain being problematic before 2020. At most, I saw people say "Hey, isn't it kind of funny that they built an attraction based on this movie they banned?" but I don't think any of those were meant as complaints.

Jayspency10 hours ago

Most of what Disney does nowadays is mostly done based on what looks good on paper.

Disstevefan110 hours ago

Can you please talk to Disney's movie business ;) OK, ok, "nothing" is an absurd term. Extreme terms like "nothing" is low hanging fruit for folks who want to argue. In my opinion, Disney makes decisions mostly for Disney and lesser for guest/fans.

JMcMahonEsq10 hours ago

From a strictly authorization standpoint, of course Disney does what it wants to do. Every business does what it wants to do at the end of the day, guest/fans have no say in an operation of any business. However to say guest/fans have nothing to do with decisions is just absurd. Disney is looking for Profit. That means decisions are made to increase profits. This can come in the form of direct increase in sales, direct decrease in costs, or increasing attendance/mitigating loss through customer good will. Out of those 3 methods to achieve the goal, 2 of them are directly related to customers. You need your customers to keep coming and buying tickets to the parks and need them to continue buying things. The only way of increasing profit that isn't directly related to customers is decreasing costs, but even that has to be weighed with the idea of will decreasing cost result in a loss of 1 or 3. And the millions spent on a re-skin of Splash Mountain certainly wasn't a direct cost saving.

Disstevefan111 hours ago

You can drill back on my post and I said this way before the reskin happened - I never said it was on a whim, Disney had THEIR reasons, I will attempt to guess; number one, social justice, perhaps the old animatronics and systems were getting too expensive to fix and maintain, no spare parts, must have replacement parts custom made etc. I really think they decided to expend huge dollars in labor, materials, engineering costs, to kill two birds; lower maintenance in the long run (that appears to be NOT working at the moment) and social justice. My main point of this post is, Disney does what they want to do. Their decision has nothing to do with their guests or fans. If there are guests who happen to like a given change it is pure coincidence.

JMcMahonEsq11 hours ago

Wait wait wait. I am confused, is Disney a greedy corporation who is out just to make the maximum amount of money, or are they not? So your saying WDW took down a ride that was operating fine and people were riding. Decided to expend huge dollars in labor, materials, engineering costs just because? They SPENT millions of dollars...on a whim? It wasn't to make money? And lets face it its only guests and fans that pay money so if they are, its for something they want. So WDW didn't look at any data/studies and say if we do this replacement, it will result in customers wanting things enough to pay/attendance/ect? Your story is they just WOKE up on a Tuesday (get it....WOKE up, come on its funny and almost Friday) and decided to spend millions of dollars for nothing?