Judge hears arguments from Disney and DeSantis lawyers to rule on a motion to dismiss Disney's lawsuit against CFTOD

Forum Forums Tweet Share Tweet Share

Posted: Tuesday December 12, 2023 2:22pm ET by WDWMAGIC Staff

This morning, U.S. District Judge Allen Winsor heard arguments from lawyers representing Disney, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, and DeSantis' Central Florida Tourism Oversight District board.

The former Reedy Creek Improvement District HQ is now home to a Ron DeSantis appointed board of supervisors and CEO

DeSantis and CFTOD have filed a motion to dismiss Disney's federal lawsuit, in which the entertainment giant claims that there has been "A targeted campaign of government retaliation-orchestrated at every step by Governor DeSantis as punishment for Disney's protected speech now threatens Disney's business operations, jeopardizes its economic future in the region, and violates its constitutional rights."

Lawyers for DeSantis and CFTOD have argued that it doesn't matter if the governor's actions were in retaliation, with Disney layers taking the opposite position.

Judge Winsor said today that he will issue a ruling in the coming weeks.

Disney CEO Bob Iger recently commented on the situation in Florida, outlining his views. He said, "The company, while I was gone, decided to take a position against the Don't Say Gay bill that was moving through the Florida Legislature. I won't comment about what I would have done or not done, but the company took that position against it. The governor got very, very angry at the company when it took that position and decided to punish the company by basically stripping its rights to a special district around Disney World that had been in place for decades. The question wasn't even about the bill. It was about does a company have a right to free speech. And if it exercises its right to free speech, it should not face retribution."

Discuss on the Forums

Get Walt Disney World News Delivered to Your Inbox

peter114358 days ago

No. But it’s the start of the process

MR.Dis8 days ago

Does this mean a new agreement has been reached with Disney? I am trying to read between the lines on just what this is saying.

flyakite8 days ago

castlecake2.021 days ago

Yes

Stripes21 days ago

Has Disney/CFTOD continued to replace the purple direction signage with the new blue color scheme since CFTOD took over?

mkt21 days ago

You're right. The new document will be different. It will be "different" in the way that Chris Gaines was "different" from Garth Brooks or how the drummer from Nirvana is "different" from the singer of the Foo Fighters.

Unbanshee21 days ago

Both are effectively picked by the Governor, just not technically. Look no further than the communications "strategy" with the replacement of Gilzean of the Governor's office getting out ahead of every single step of the process

lazyboy97o21 days ago

The settlement acknowledged the “need” to change the comprehensive plan, which undermines this idea. So too does the lack of an agreement, as the 2032 Comprehensive Plan wasn’t that different than the again in force 2020 Comprehensive Plan.

Brian21 days ago

That's understandable for sure. I just felt inclined to make the distinction due to the ongoing conversation, as the district administrator is selected by the board, while the board is selected by the governor.

mkt21 days ago

The new agreement will be functionally the same as the one Disney was sued over.

pdude8121 days ago

You're right. This has been going on so long I just lumped all the antagonists together.

Brian21 days ago

Not to nitpick, but Gilzean was district administrator, not a board member.

pdude8121 days ago

A bigger risk than keeping Garcia and Gilzean on the board as active disruptors? I don't agree with their decision to stall the federal lawsuit, but I understand why they saw the status quo as a risk to growth over the next few years.