DeSantis' Central Florida Tourism Oversight District reveals its latest plans for scrapping Disney World Annual Pass benefits for its employees

Sep 27, 2023 in "Reedy Creek Improvement District"

Posted: Wednesday September 27, 2023 6:48pm ET by WDWMAGIC Staff

In a meeting of the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District board this evening, CEO Glen Gilzean revealed his latest plan to replace the Walt Disney World Annual Pass benefit given to its employees.

District employees will be given a stipend of $3000, which can be used to purchase Walt Disney World Annual Passes for the employee and family members if desired.

Gilzean said, "District Leadership ultimately determined that $3,000 was the actual cost of purchasing the equivalent pass benefits currently held by most employees."

The stiped figure announced today is an increase from the original $1000 proposed at a previous meeting. Walt Disney World Annual Passes range in price from $400 to $1400 per person, depending on the tier of pass chosen.

Board member Peri said of the stipend increase, "We like most of our employees initially understood that the passes were standard third party passes and we set the value accordingly. We have since discovered that the passes and their features were much more than that and were in fact designed for people who are committed to servicing and supporting the parks, not merely for attendees."

Employees will receive the stipend ninety days from the date of hire post the probationary period. The stipend will be issued annually and is subjected to tax withholdings and budget appropriations. Retirees, depending on their age and years of service, are eligible, with variations in eligibility for spouses of deceased employees or retirees. Unless re-adopted, the policy will expire in two fiscal years from October 1, 2023.

The removal of the Walt Disney World Annual Pass benefit follows the Ron DeSantis-appointed board receiving a bill from Walt Disney World for $2.5 million in theme park tickets and discounts given to employees of the district.

Here is the full wording of the new policy.

EMPLOYEE & RETIREE BENEFITS STIPEND (ANNUAL ADMISSION PASS) PROGAM
1. POLICY
Pursuant to a previous agreement with Walt Disney World, the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District
provided an annual Walt Disney World Admission Pass to eligible employees and retirees. The annual
admission pass was a privilege and not a vested right of employees or retirees. The pass program was
reviewed periodically and was subject to revision or cancellation in whole or in part at the discretion of
the District. Based on the sunsetting of the admission pass program referenced in the Benefits section of
the 2011 Employee Policy Manual, the District will instead offer an annual stipend based on the following
policy terms.
2. LIMITATIONS
The annual stipend is a privilege and not a vested right of employees or retirees. It is reviewed periodically
and is subject to revision or cancellation in whole or in part at the discretion of the District. Stipends in
no way guarantee admission to parks or events and do not include or provide access to any theme park,
restaurant, destination, hotel, or merchandise discount. The annual stipend in no way obligates recipients
of the stipend to purchase Walt Disney World Admission Passes or any other products or services.
Recipients of the stipend may use the stipend for any legal purpose they choose in their discretion.
This policy applies to employees of the District unless the employee is covered by a collective bargaining
agreement (CBA) which has provisions that specifically address these matters and differs from this policy.
Nothing in this policy is intended to, nor shall it limit any inherent management rights of the District in
any CBA. In the event that a specific provision of a CBA is inconsistent with this policy, the provision
contained in the CBA shall prevail for covered bargaining unit employees. Otherwise, this policy shall apply
according to its terms and conditions to all employees of the District, unless and until superseded by action
of the District to modify, replace and/or cancel the policy/program/plan, or, unless expressly contradicted
by a specific provision of a CBA, or, unless superseded by law. The amount of the annual stipend is subject
to annual budgeting and appropriations by the District Board of Supervisors.
The Employee & Retiree Benefits Stipend policy sunsets at the completion of two fiscal years beginning
October 1, 2023, unless re-adopted prior to its expiration by the Board of Supervisors. The sunsetting of
stipends does not reinstate the Annual Admission Pass policy.
3. POLICY DETAIL
3.1 District Administration will be responsible for the administration of this policy.
3.2 Employee Eligibility and Distribution
3.2.1 All full-time hourly employees will receive an annual stipend ninety (90) days from
the date of hire upon successful completion of the new hire probationary period.
3.2.2 Full-time salaried and salaried non-exempt employees are eligible for an annual
stipend ninety (90) days from the date of hire upon successful completion of the new hire
probationary period.
3.2.3 Stipends will be issued on an annual basis, per the District’s fiscal year, to eligible
employees subject to annual budgeting and appropriations by the District Board of
Supervisors.
3.2.4 Stipends are subject to applicable tax withholding requirements.
3.2.5 The District at its sole discretion may utilize the services of third party vendors or
agents to distribute, pay, and/or offer stipends for the use of procuring admission passes
to theme parks or other perks offered at a later time.
3.9 Retiree Eligibility and Distribution
3.9.1 Employees who retire at or after age 55 with at least twenty (20) years of continuous
service with the District, or at any age with at least thirty (30) years of continuous service
with the District, will receive the stipend held immediately prior to the time of retirement
at the time of retirement.
3.9.2 Employees who retire prior to age 55, with at least twenty (20) years of continuous
service with the District (but less than thirty years), will receive the stipend held
immediately prior to the time of retirement upon attaining the age of 55.
3.9.3 Employees who retire because of a permanent disability, who are age 45 or older
with 10 or more years of continuous service, will receive the stipend held immediately
prior to the time of retirement at the time of retirement.
3.9.4 The spouse of a deceased retiree with at least twenty (20) years of service will
continue to be eligible for the annual stipend held by the retiree prior to his or her death
until the remarriage or death of the surviving spouse.
3.9.5 The spouse of a deceased employee will continue to be eligible for the annual
stipend held by the employee prior to his or her death until the end of the calendar year
of the employee’s death. The stipend will not be renewed the following year.
3.9.6 Retiree stipends will be paid in January in conjunction with the benefit plan year.
3.9.7 Stipends are subject to applicable tax withholding requirements.
3.9.8 The District at its sole discretion may utilize the services of third party vendors or
agents to distribute, pay, and/or offer stipends for the use of procuring admission passes
to theme parks or other perks offered at a later time.

Discuss on the Forums

Get Walt Disney World News Delivered to Your Inbox

    View all comments →

    mkt11 days ago

    The free speech claim was federal, the land use claim was state.

    mikejs7811 days ago

    The federal case was not predicated on FL free speech law, it was based around 1st amendment jurisprudence and the US Constitution contract clause. The state case was based around state law but not speech state law.

    Bullseye196711 days ago

    I am not sure of the actual filing and I will admit that I am too lazy to look through all the filings you posted, Thank you, but I think it was a claim on FL law and not Federal. The Sol on "free speech" in FL is 3 years, but it is not limited in USC, And if this is right, it was what I quoted above. The clock is ticking. A federal court can not take action on a state law case if SoL has expired.

    JoeCamel13 days ago

    Saved them a bunch of cash

    Chi8413 days ago

    The State was happy with the way things were. For many, many years.

    mikejs7813 days ago

    My gut says that beginning in 2027 there will be legislation that slowly picks away at CFTOD and gradually returns control to Disney. It won't happen all at once - but I bet it will happen.

    Chi8413 days ago

    There's a battle being lost, but it's not really a PR battle and it only tangentially involves Disney.

    mkt13 days ago

    You’re right that there wasn’t a massive public rally to defend Disney. At least not in the way we often see with political figures or causes. But that doesn’t mean they lost the PR battle. It just means they played it differently. They didn’t need cheering crowds. They let the state’s actions speak for themselves. The Lake Nona cancellation - whether intentional or not - ended up being the loudest statement. Thousands of high-paying jobs. Gone. Local business groups noticed. Real estate noticed. Economists noticed. That stuck. Meanwhile, the “win” Florida claimed was largely symbolic - swapping one board for another - while Disney kept building, kept expanding, and retained the infrastructure and bond authority they needed. The machine never stopped. And let’s not forget: the only only people visibly waving flags on the property line during this entire episode? They were on the state’s side, and those flags bore symbols we all agree have no place in a civilized society. So no - Disney didn’t lose the PR war. They just didn’t fight it with soundbites. They let time and economic impact do the talking.

    flynnibus13 days ago

    Who came to defend Disney? Who lined up to call out DeSantis' action? Who lined up to point out the cabel action in the Legislature? Who used Disney as an example of what can happen? I'm not talking about who wrote stories to cover the news.. I'm talking about who put their name on the line to call out the injustice that was happening? How many people did you hear regurgitating the false propoganda about taxes? How many people did you hear thinking this RCID thing was some long running scam that was time to go? I'm talking about who the gen pop saw as in the wrong... most did not flock to defend Disney... they saw it as some corporate scam that finally was being taken down.. Disney was pretty much the target of the most direct, blatant, outright cheered political driven retribution I can think of in any recent memory... and the gen pop thinks DeSantis was eliminating corporate benefits and DEI non-sense. That's the PR battle Disney lost.

    Prince-113 days ago

    Oh Ronnie didn't need Disney's help to accomplish that. He was never going to be president.

    MR.Dis13 days ago

    Disney won in one respect, this incident totally destroyed a certain Govenors hope of ever being seen as Presidential material.

    mkt13 days ago

    That’s a fair framing if you’re evaluating from a strictly structural standpoint Yes, Disney no longer controls the board, and yes, they negotiated toward a new normal rather than scorched-earth resistance. But to say they “lost the PR battle”? I strongly disagree. Florida came off as punitive, erratic, and willing to jeopardize thousands of high-paying jobs over a political tantrum. The Lake Nona cancellation - whether coincidental or not - felt like fallout, and perception did the heavy lifting. That loss is now linked to the state’s actions. No press release needed. Florida is viewed as having cost the region several thousand high earners, along with their housing demand, business growth, and tax revenue. That’s not just bad optics. That’s third-world-level policy sabotage. Meanwhile, Disney kept building. The board that was supposed to rein them in greenlit a $17B expansion. Bond authority stayed. Infrastructure control stayed. Functionally, nothing stopped. Sure, the expansion brings jobs. But they're mostly tourism and hospitality roles. These aren't six-figure white collar transfers — they're hourly park positions. Florida traded a long-term white-collar boom for a short-term PR win and a few more popcorn carts. That’s not a victory. That’s a downgrade. If anything, Disney let Florida win the headline, then quietly walked away with the outcome. That’s not “dealing with the devil.” That’s knowing when to let the devil shake his fist at a cloud while you pour the foundation for your next park expansion.

    LAKid5313 days ago

    Precisely

    UNCgolf13 days ago

    Indeed. And while I wish Disney had fought to the end, that was never likely. Publicly traded corporations just don't really operate that way. For example, I've represented corporate clients who had a good chance of prevailing against the government in regulatory investigations, but they would have spent more on the fight than they spent on the settlement -- so they settled. There's always going to be a cost/benefit analysis (which often involves more than just the potential legal fees) regardless of whether they think they're right. Incidentally, this is one of the reasons Harvard is more likely to fight to the end in their current litigation (although that's certainly not guaranteed). They don't have to worry about shareholders, although they do have some other outside concerns.

    Don't miss out!
    Get the latest Walt Disney World news in your inbox

    FREE EMAIL BONUS

    Stay in the loop of EVERYTHING happening at the Most Magical Place on Earth

      Get the latest Walt Disney World news as it happens, delivered straight to your email