DeSantis' Central Florida Tourism Oversight District reveals its latest plans for scrapping Disney World Annual Pass benefits for its employees

Sep 27, 2023 in "Reedy Creek Improvement District"

Posted: Wednesday September 27, 2023 6:48pm ET by WDWMAGIC Staff

In a meeting of the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District board this evening, CEO Glen Gilzean revealed his latest plan to replace the Walt Disney World Annual Pass benefit given to its employees.

District employees will be given a stipend of $3000, which can be used to purchase Walt Disney World Annual Passes for the employee and family members if desired.

Gilzean said, "District Leadership ultimately determined that $3,000 was the actual cost of purchasing the equivalent pass benefits currently held by most employees."

The stiped figure announced today is an increase from the original $1000 proposed at a previous meeting. Walt Disney World Annual Passes range in price from $400 to $1400 per person, depending on the tier of pass chosen.

Board member Peri said of the stipend increase, "We like most of our employees initially understood that the passes were standard third party passes and we set the value accordingly. We have since discovered that the passes and their features were much more than that and were in fact designed for people who are committed to servicing and supporting the parks, not merely for attendees."

Employees will receive the stipend ninety days from the date of hire post the probationary period. The stipend will be issued annually and is subjected to tax withholdings and budget appropriations. Retirees, depending on their age and years of service, are eligible, with variations in eligibility for spouses of deceased employees or retirees. Unless re-adopted, the policy will expire in two fiscal years from October 1, 2023.

The removal of the Walt Disney World Annual Pass benefit follows the Ron DeSantis-appointed board receiving a bill from Walt Disney World for $2.5 million in theme park tickets and discounts given to employees of the district.

Here is the full wording of the new policy.

EMPLOYEE & RETIREE BENEFITS STIPEND (ANNUAL ADMISSION PASS) PROGAM
1. POLICY
Pursuant to a previous agreement with Walt Disney World, the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District
provided an annual Walt Disney World Admission Pass to eligible employees and retirees. The annual
admission pass was a privilege and not a vested right of employees or retirees. The pass program was
reviewed periodically and was subject to revision or cancellation in whole or in part at the discretion of
the District. Based on the sunsetting of the admission pass program referenced in the Benefits section of
the 2011 Employee Policy Manual, the District will instead offer an annual stipend based on the following
policy terms.
2. LIMITATIONS
The annual stipend is a privilege and not a vested right of employees or retirees. It is reviewed periodically
and is subject to revision or cancellation in whole or in part at the discretion of the District. Stipends in
no way guarantee admission to parks or events and do not include or provide access to any theme park,
restaurant, destination, hotel, or merchandise discount. The annual stipend in no way obligates recipients
of the stipend to purchase Walt Disney World Admission Passes or any other products or services.
Recipients of the stipend may use the stipend for any legal purpose they choose in their discretion.
This policy applies to employees of the District unless the employee is covered by a collective bargaining
agreement (CBA) which has provisions that specifically address these matters and differs from this policy.
Nothing in this policy is intended to, nor shall it limit any inherent management rights of the District in
any CBA. In the event that a specific provision of a CBA is inconsistent with this policy, the provision
contained in the CBA shall prevail for covered bargaining unit employees. Otherwise, this policy shall apply
according to its terms and conditions to all employees of the District, unless and until superseded by action
of the District to modify, replace and/or cancel the policy/program/plan, or, unless expressly contradicted
by a specific provision of a CBA, or, unless superseded by law. The amount of the annual stipend is subject
to annual budgeting and appropriations by the District Board of Supervisors.
The Employee & Retiree Benefits Stipend policy sunsets at the completion of two fiscal years beginning
October 1, 2023, unless re-adopted prior to its expiration by the Board of Supervisors. The sunsetting of
stipends does not reinstate the Annual Admission Pass policy.
3. POLICY DETAIL
3.1 District Administration will be responsible for the administration of this policy.
3.2 Employee Eligibility and Distribution
3.2.1 All full-time hourly employees will receive an annual stipend ninety (90) days from
the date of hire upon successful completion of the new hire probationary period.
3.2.2 Full-time salaried and salaried non-exempt employees are eligible for an annual
stipend ninety (90) days from the date of hire upon successful completion of the new hire
probationary period.
3.2.3 Stipends will be issued on an annual basis, per the District’s fiscal year, to eligible
employees subject to annual budgeting and appropriations by the District Board of
Supervisors.
3.2.4 Stipends are subject to applicable tax withholding requirements.
3.2.5 The District at its sole discretion may utilize the services of third party vendors or
agents to distribute, pay, and/or offer stipends for the use of procuring admission passes
to theme parks or other perks offered at a later time.
3.9 Retiree Eligibility and Distribution
3.9.1 Employees who retire at or after age 55 with at least twenty (20) years of continuous
service with the District, or at any age with at least thirty (30) years of continuous service
with the District, will receive the stipend held immediately prior to the time of retirement
at the time of retirement.
3.9.2 Employees who retire prior to age 55, with at least twenty (20) years of continuous
service with the District (but less than thirty years), will receive the stipend held
immediately prior to the time of retirement upon attaining the age of 55.
3.9.3 Employees who retire because of a permanent disability, who are age 45 or older
with 10 or more years of continuous service, will receive the stipend held immediately
prior to the time of retirement at the time of retirement.
3.9.4 The spouse of a deceased retiree with at least twenty (20) years of service will
continue to be eligible for the annual stipend held by the retiree prior to his or her death
until the remarriage or death of the surviving spouse.
3.9.5 The spouse of a deceased employee will continue to be eligible for the annual
stipend held by the employee prior to his or her death until the end of the calendar year
of the employee’s death. The stipend will not be renewed the following year.
3.9.6 Retiree stipends will be paid in January in conjunction with the benefit plan year.
3.9.7 Stipends are subject to applicable tax withholding requirements.
3.9.8 The District at its sole discretion may utilize the services of third party vendors or
agents to distribute, pay, and/or offer stipends for the use of procuring admission passes
to theme parks or other perks offered at a later time.

Discuss on the Forums

Get Walt Disney World News Delivered to Your Inbox

    View all comments →

    josiah mazelin16 days ago

    I said basically. You just listed two rides at each park. My point is proven

    Goofyernmost16 days ago

    With the kind of promotion that they once were famous for were to be used, they can get all the hype they need and spend a hell of a lot less to do it. They have to make what they have be exciting and not worry about what others might be doing. They stayed on top for about 60 years doing that and then, I assume to give bigger bonuses to the executives, they stopped producing those things and even if they don't admit it, they are running scared at the moment, in spite of increased profits. They have to make that dominance last, but I don't see them doing that unless they fill up those empty buildings and put something good in them and promote, promote, promote. That is second only to location, location, location.

    Sirwalterraleigh17 days ago

    Galactic spirit Halloween was sorta in that ballpark

    Sirwalterraleigh17 days ago

    Nah…they’ve crossed the Rubicon on “attracting middle class families”. They’re well past that price point to make any such endeavor turn out to be anything but a “loss” to the stock wonks. That strategy was their philosophy for many years…expansion to create more traffic and sell more product across all business was Eisner 101 - essentially, but they dumped that 15-20 year ago. Limiting investment and all but eliminating expansion to cap overhead and then attempting to make more revenue/profit off what was already paid for. That strategy is incompatible with “expanding/pricing to make it more accessible”

    JoeCamel17 days ago

    It's non-sensical too, increase your costs to get less money per guest and do huge capital outlays? Bob sez nyet

    Tha Realest17 days ago

    There’s no evidence 1) this is happening, or 2) they intend to do this.

    ChrisFL17 days ago

    They had a 5th gate and they closed it..................DisneyQuest :p

    Advisable Joseph17 days ago

    Disney needs land to expand. Pulling guests from the Magic Kingdom and Epcot (or otherwise unceasing attraction supply for the guests), then lowering prices to increase volume (and income) and accessing middle-class families, while building out the other parks, is the idea. Would you consider a Magic Kingdom Colony across the Lagoon or part of the current parking lot, which guests could access with Magic Kingdom tickets, a "5th gate"? How about parking, so the park can expand into the old parking lot?

    gwhb7517 days ago

    Agree with this. The only unfortunate thing is that "expanding existing parks" doesn't get the same hype as "a whole new park". Now if we could only have a true expansion of existing parks (i.e. just add new things (like villains land) and not take things away first (like tropical americas in AK)).

    JoeCamel17 days ago

    I think a lot of the salivating over a new park is fatigue with the same offerings year after year or a dribble of something new. Stale has a stench. Fans have "done" everything in the parks time after time so they want new and "damn the cost it's what I want". Does not have to be logical or make sense it is a want and I need my wants fulfilled ipso facto TDO is going to build me a new park. Seems to point to someone who has never run a business nor cares if that business thrives to feed the stockholders

    monothingie17 days ago

    Forget the tremendous capital expense to build a new park. The most important thing to Disney is YOY growth. The quarterly earnings mean EVERYTHING to Bob and Wall Street. Key amongst that is that Disney cares tremendously about operational costs and maximizing LL revenue streams. While a new park may be tremendously popular, it also increases operational expenses significantly. It is also very likely that it will cannibalize a large portion of the existing guest base. LL brings in a tremendous amount of revenue for Disney. It works best for Disney with full parks, adding a new park will dilute LL revenue at the existing parks. If a new park was going to justify the build cost and not affect the OI for WDW, then shovels would have been in the ground already. They've done the analysis, and a new park is not financially viable at this point.

    lazyboy97o17 days ago

    Planning permission and building permission are two separate things. You need planning approval first. Comprehensive Plans (along with Master Plans, Future Land Use Plans and Zoning Plans) are also not set in stone and quite malleable.

    Dranth17 days ago

    I disagree with him on a number of things, but he isn't wrong on this one. They have underbuilt parks that can absorb a LOT more people if they expand them. Those parks have existing infrastructure which makes it easier and cheaper to develop and build out vs. an entire new park. They understand their main audience has limited vacation time and already know people are unlikely to extend their vacations but instead sacrifice one thing they would have done for something else. They have a strained employee pool that has never recovered from 2020 and staffing new builds in existing parks is WORLDS easier than trying to staff an entire new park. Even an entire parks worth of attractions built over the four current parks would require less staffing than the same number of attractions in a brand-new park once you factor in employees for back of house, support, utilities, security, transportation, etc. Sure, nothing is impossible, and I'll gladly admit to being wrong on this if it does happen, but it would be business malpractice to do so in Florida anytime soon. I would expect most of the other locations around the world with room to get a new gate before Florida.

    Centauri Space Station18 days ago

    Navi river, safari, Toy story mania, alien saucers?