Mixed Reactions as Disney Unveils Tiana's Bayou Adventure Ride Through Video

Jun 01, 2024 in "Tiana's Bayou Adventure"

Tiana's Bayou Adventure walls removed - May 30 2024
Posted: Saturday June 1, 2024 3:00pm ET by WDWMAGIC Staff

Disney took the unusual step of releasing a full POV (point of view) ride-through video today of their highly anticipated new attraction, Tiana's Bayou Adventure, nearly a month before it opens at Walt Disney World on June 28.

The ride, which replaces the iconic Splash Mountain, has sparked a wave of mixed reactions among YouTube viewers. We reviewed the first 1500 YouTube user comments submitted in the first 6 hours of the video's debut to compile this summary.

It should be noted that the comments we reviewed are all based on Disney's official POV, not in-person ride experiences, and they are the opinion of the YouTube users and not WDWMAGIC. We will hear many more in-person reviews once previews begin on June 2, and we will also have an in-depth WDWMAGIC review after we get to experience the ride in-person.

While the animatronics and some visual aspects of the ride have been praised, the overall sentiment has skewed negatively, with many YouTube viewers expressing disappointment in the new attraction's storytelling and overall experience.

Story and Narrative: A Missed Opportunity?

One of the most frequent criticisms centers around the ride's storyline. Viewers find the plot—centering on Tiana searching for party musicians—lacking depth and coherence. Many feel the story does not capture the magic of "The Princess and the Frog" and misses an opportunity to include more iconic elements from the film.

"The storyline is a miss for me. You could've worked in Dr Facilier and his voodoo friends. While searching for a band for the party we could've taken a wrong turn in the bayou and had the evil, dark tension leading up to the drop," one viewer comments.

Another viewer echoes this sentiment, stating, "There's like 3 stories in this ride, 1st we are looking for people/creatures aka musicians to play in a band 2nd we get shrunk or turned into frogs to look for tiny musicians, 3rd we are a special ingredient/spice for Tiana's party."

Comparisons to Splash Mountain

Many fans can't help but compare Tiana's Bayou Adventure to its predecessor, Splash Mountain. The new ride is frequently unfavorably compared to the old, with viewers lamenting the loss of the original's cohesive story, dramatic tension, and memorable music.

"Splash Mountain had a story with an ANTAGONIST. This one… did not, instead you are looking for some kind of spice… Off to Japan I go. ZIP-A-DEE-DOO-DAH EVERYONE," one comment reads.

"From a fun zipadeedodah story that starts with a nice leisurely ride through Brer Rabbit's home… And now we have… food," another user remarks.

Ride Experience: Criticisms of Empty Spaces

The new ride is also criticized for having too much empty space and dead air, making parts of it feel dull and lifeless. Viewers note that certain sections feel underwhelming and lack the engaging elements that made Splash Mountain a beloved attraction.

"Some portions are awkwardly quiet…" one viewer points out.

"Except for the finale it just seems so empty. There seems to just be a lot of dead space that they really had no idea what to do with," another review states.

No Dr. Facillier

Fans are particularly vocal about the missed opportunities in the ride's design and storytelling. The absence of Dr. Facilier, a key antagonist from the movie, is a common point of contention. Many feel his inclusion would have added much-needed tension and excitement.

"The greatest missed opportunity in Disney parks history is to leave out Facilier and not have 'are you ready!???' playing while going up the lift hill for the final drop," one disappointed fan notes.

"Spent all the money on the plastic plants and Christmas lights to hide all of the dead space. Bayou magic? Magic it is not. The word 'boring' comes to mind," another adds.

Praise for Animatronics and Visuals

Despite the criticism, several aspects of the ride receive praise. Viewers appreciate the high-quality animatronics and visual design, which many find to be a significant improvement over Splash Mountain.

"The animatronics are beautiful and well done. I love Tiana and think it's awesome that she's getting some love. That last scene is beautiful and impressive," one user remarks.

Another viewer adds, "Visually, it's fantastic, and 'Special Spice' is a fantastic earworm."

Fans also note the ride's appeal to younger audiences who may not have experienced Splash Mountain, with some expressing excitement to see it in person. "The animatronics look amazing! I can't wait to ride it next month!" one comment reads.

Mixed Reactions

The overall reaction from viewers so far is one of disappointment, with many expressing that the ride does not meet their expectations. Despite some praise for the animatronics and visual effects, the lack of a compelling story and the numerous missed opportunities leave many fans yearning for Splash Mountain.

"This is so disappointing, Tiana deserved waaaay better than this snooze fest," one user comments.

"A beautiful, dull, muddled mess. No sense of drama, pace, excitement. So much dead air and plastic flowers. But lots and lots of fireflies," another review concludes.

As Tiana's Bayou Adventure prepares to open, it remains to be seen how the attraction will be received by the wider public. For now, the mixed reactions from the official POV video highlight the challenges Disney faces in reimagining beloved attractions while meeting the high expectations of its fans.

Discuss on the Forums

Get Walt Disney World News Delivered to Your Inbox

    View all comments →

    solidyne1 day ago

    He is not saying the same thing. You deleted his next sentence. He said guests "are a fulcrum." He said it was absurd to think guest "have nothing to do" with decisions. Then he goes on to explain how guests do, in fact, factor in. You edited his post to make it look like you were saying the same thing. You: Disney does XYZ. They shouldn't do that. Poster: But ALL businesses necessarily do XYZ" You: So you agree with me! Me: Well, no, he doesn't really. By the way, I know you started using winky emojis as some defensive measure when you thought people weren't getting your jokes. But that never was the problem. It wasn't that they didn't know you were joking; it was that they disagreed with the point your jokes were making. So, you can ease up now with the winkies. People can understand jokes even if they don't like them.

    Disgruntled Walt3 days ago

    I like your new picture. "Quizzical Walt"

    Disstevefan13 days ago

    It was a necessary downgrade ;)

    mickEblu3 days ago

    They reskinned a jet to celebrate the reskin of an attraction where a Fox threatened to skin a rabbit.

    Tha Realest3 days ago

    They reskinned a jet to celebrate the reskin of an attraction.

    Disstevefan13 days ago

    Exactly. Exactly We agree completely. When I said this, it was absurd. I wont say that ;)

    EagleScout6103 days ago

    Only took them a year to get it working. Progress, I guess

    DarrenD3 days ago

    Rode 2x times yesterday and it was working well! The most amount of stuff I've seen working since opening :)

    JMcMahonEsq3 days ago

    Again, I don't get what your point is. Disney is a for profit publicly traded company. Everything decision is done for the benefit of the company/Disney. The officers of any company have fiduciary duty to make all decision in the best interest of the company. The sole purpose of any decision of a company is to benefit the company. They aren't non-profits or charities where the intended goal/purpose is to benefit a certain subset of the population. Guest/fan feelings are never a goal or why companies make decisions. They are a fulcrum to support goals. Businesses offer guest what the they want in order to make money. They don't make money in order to give customers what they want.

    Brer Panther3 days ago

    I know that just by posting this I'm stepping into a minefield, but I genuinely do not remember seeing any complaints, or hearing of any complaints, about Splash Mountain being problematic before 2020. At most, I saw people say "Hey, isn't it kind of funny that they built an attraction based on this movie they banned?" but I don't think any of those were meant as complaints.

    Jayspency3 days ago

    Most of what Disney does nowadays is mostly done based on what looks good on paper.

    Disstevefan13 days ago

    Can you please talk to Disney's movie business ;) OK, ok, "nothing" is an absurd term. Extreme terms like "nothing" is low hanging fruit for folks who want to argue. In my opinion, Disney makes decisions mostly for Disney and lesser for guest/fans.

    JMcMahonEsq3 days ago

    From a strictly authorization standpoint, of course Disney does what it wants to do. Every business does what it wants to do at the end of the day, guest/fans have no say in an operation of any business. However to say guest/fans have nothing to do with decisions is just absurd. Disney is looking for Profit. That means decisions are made to increase profits. This can come in the form of direct increase in sales, direct decrease in costs, or increasing attendance/mitigating loss through customer good will. Out of those 3 methods to achieve the goal, 2 of them are directly related to customers. You need your customers to keep coming and buying tickets to the parks and need them to continue buying things. The only way of increasing profit that isn't directly related to customers is decreasing costs, but even that has to be weighed with the idea of will decreasing cost result in a loss of 1 or 3. And the millions spent on a re-skin of Splash Mountain certainly wasn't a direct cost saving.

    Disstevefan13 days ago

    You can drill back on my post and I said this way before the reskin happened - I never said it was on a whim, Disney had THEIR reasons, I will attempt to guess; number one, social justice, perhaps the old animatronics and systems were getting too expensive to fix and maintain, no spare parts, must have replacement parts custom made etc. I really think they decided to expend huge dollars in labor, materials, engineering costs, to kill two birds; lower maintenance in the long run (that appears to be NOT working at the moment) and social justice. My main point of this post is, Disney does what they want to do. Their decision has nothing to do with their guests or fans. If there are guests who happen to like a given change it is pure coincidence.

    Don't miss out!
    Get the latest Walt Disney World news in your inbox

    FREE EMAIL BONUS

    Stay in the loop of EVERYTHING happening at the Most Magical Place on Earth

      Get the latest Walt Disney World news as it happens, delivered straight to your email